It seems that the argument is the main event. We need to show that the tone of voice you're yelling in, and the grammar of your speech are the clinching features. The medium is the message. Marshall McLuhan. The form is the creation. A frustrated Mr Conti tries to explain the foundation of Romantic debates in regard to Rousseau and the anti-transcendency that formed modernism. Words are exchanged like "dynamism" and "rapid change". But it washes over my head like the steady weather change that is consuming my home town as they speak.
They claim "WE NEED THE UNCONSCIOUSNESS OF HUMANITY - their stupidity, animalism and dreams." But what of this unconsciousness? The mind numb I feel brings no enlightenment like it had intended to inspire. And what of dreams?
No comments:
Post a Comment